|
The Centre for Information Quality Management |
|
A service of IAL, run on behalf of the UK eInformation Group
(UKeiG) and CILIP: the Chartered Institute of Library and Information
Professionals since 1993.
|
More...
|
|
|
Database Quality Criteria
One of the earliest article on database quality
was by Reva Basch in the October 1990 Database Searcher: Measuring
the Quality of the Data: Report on the Fourth Annual SCOUG Retreat.
Since then, numerous articles have appeared on
the topic (see Readings and Links) and CIQM has put together
a table of evaluation criteria.
SCOUG (the Southern California Online User
Group) came up with ten headings or criteria by which databases
should be judged; while I do not always agree with the way in which
they have divided topics by these headings ("currency" under the
heading "accuracy", for instance), they do make a useful guide.
Their headings are (Click on the criteria for more detail):
After working in this area for some time, and
analysing a range of approaches (Alexander
and Tate (1999); Judith
Conway (1998); Alison Cooke (2001)), CIQM developed a set of
quality criteria specifically for Web resources. The table below
offers sets of questions which users should ask themselves about
the resource.
| Quality Criteria |
Evaluation Questions |
Content
|
Audience? Audience groups? Purpose/ Motivation?
Timeliness? Currency? Completeness? Accuracy of information
and links? Are there external links/ should there be/are they
appropriate/are they date-stamped? Dates of coverage (this could
also go under relative value in final section)? Intrinsic value
to your users? Is the information useful in this format? Does
content require frequent updating? Language (either level or
national or both) appropriate? Is depth and scope consistent
throughout site? What value is added by the medium (if any)?
Is there/should there be an archive? Is standard information
(e.g. times of opening) always clear and in sight? Is any information
repeated needlessly? |
| Authority |
Coverage? Scope? Reputation? Refereed/Editorial
control? Author given? Author details (education, experience,
etc) given? Contact information? Expertise of author/owner/publisher?
Bias? Stability? Reliability? Is the text organised in a natural,
logical and pedagogic way? Is there outdated or superfluous
information? Useful headings? Date produced/mounted/revised?
Are sources cited/are they reputable? How often is it updated?
Is this apparent? Links up-to-date and reliable? If the site
is a gateway or a portal what authority is given to its links?
Who evaluates these? Who annotates these? Evidence of quality
control? Meta-information (e.g. abstract) and metadata (e.g.
subject terms, publisher)? |
| Design |
Good graphic design? Readable? Good use of
suitable colour(s)? Graphics and art serve a function/appropriate?
Icons clearly represent what is intended? Text grammatical,
spelling OK? Does text stand alone for use in text-only mode?
Good balance of text and graphics? Is attention paid to needs
of disabled? Presentation appropriate for audience/audience
group? Interface clear and uncluttered? Too much/too little
multimedia? Information lost in complex design? Is white space
well used to enhance readability? Are there annoying features
such as flashing banners or animated icons? Are graphics labelled
to identify them to non-graphical browsers? Does resource use
medium appropriately (or would it be as good/better on paper)?
What makes this resource useful in electronic format? |
| Organisation & Navigation |
Ease of use? Is structure of site clear?
Is the organisation logical? Signposting/Navigation OK? Consistent
sense of context/ position/level? Searchable? Does it contain
PDF files that are not searchable? Navigation elements, Buttons
and Menu items clearly/usefully labelled? |
| Access & Use |
Relative value compared with other resources
on topic? Easily accessed? Speed of access? If popular, is there
a mirror site? Help pages? Appropriate interactivity? Do pages
take a long time to load? Are there annoying features which
make it difficult to use or prevent some users from accessing
it (e.g. frames, white type that cannot be printed, Java)? Is
the site free? Is it always available? Everywhere? |
|
|
|
News
 
|
© 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006,
2007, 2008 Information Automation Limited
Last updated: Aug 2007 |